Dance [and] Theory

Contents\nDance [and] Theory. Introduction\nDANCING AND THEORIZING AND THEORIZING DANCING\nARTISTIC RESEARCH\n	Artistic Research: Between Experiment and Presentation\n	A Few Remarks about Research in Dance and Performance or – The Production of Problems\n	Knowledge and Collective Praxis\n	It does not matter or The Artist Out (of the Picture)\n	Artistic Research between Dance and Theory – A Response in Six Questions\n	References\nAESTHETICS\n	Aesthetic Experience\n	The Question of the Aesthetic\n	The Resistance to Dance Theory. Being-With, the Aesthetic Event\n	Beautiful Affects in Choreography\n	Intertwinings: The Dis/Positions of Dance Aesthetics\n	Unexpected Horizons of Meaning\n	Parallel Universes and Aesthetic Dis/Balance: Theory Interrupted, Dance Distracted\n	References\nDANCE THEORY AS A PRACTICE OF CRITIQUE\nPOLITICS\n	Dance and Politics\n	Pitfalls of ‘the Political.’ Politization as an Alternative Tool for Dance Analysis?\n	The Politics of Time\n	Contemporary Dance and the Critical Ontology of Actuality\n	Geo-Politics, Dissensus, and Dance Citizenship: The Case of South Asian Dance in Britain\n	Resilient Bodies, Stirred. Political Anecdotes from the Field of Contemporary Choreography\n	Remarks Concerning the Ontology of Dance\n	References\nDIS/BALANCES. DANCE AND THEORY\nARCHIVES\n	Steps and Gaps: Curatorial Perspectives on Dance and Archives\n	Body, Archive\n	The Constructive Compromise\n	Dance/Archive/Exhibition? Moving between Worlds\n	The Archive in Motion\n	“Mal d’Archive” – in a Different Sense than Jacques Derrida’s\n	Leaving and Pursuing Traces ‘Archive’ and ‘Archiving’ in a Dance Context\n	References\nNEXT GENERATION\n	Thoughts on the Now in the Future\n	A Relational Perspective on Dance and Theory – Implications for the Teaching of Dance Studies\n	dé-position. Or How to Move in(to) the Future?\n	Embryology as Choreography\n	Hypothesis Number Nine : The Image Is an Organ\n	What’s ‘next’?\n	In the Making. On the Generation of Movement between Dance and Theory\n	An Institution Is only as Good as the People who Work there Can be. No?\nReferences\nNotes on Contributors